Signifying nothing
cover | contact | guest map | flickr | bowling syndicate | discarama | lost notes | librarything |lastfm | eye of orris

Thursday, October 04, 2007

The most favorite thing I've written in a long time

Witness:
Thank god we are finally separated from that elitist cabal of washed-up ne'er do-wells.

Labels: , , ,

9:38 PM 0 comments Listen to this article Listen to this article

 

Thursday, September 27, 2007

Pulling out all the rhetorical tricks

Rather than waiting for today to write my email to TgP folks, I decided to take it on late last night. I'm rather pleased with my tone in the following letter. I sound like someone straight out of 1875:

Dear Mr. [X],

I had the great fortune of attending this night's concert of the Arcade Fire and LCD Sound System at Thanksgiving Point (September 26, 2007). The show was very good and you should be commended for programming these two extraordinary bands.

My evening was spoiled, however, by the overly zealous security that proclaimed my Nikon D40x camera as "too professional" to be allowed into the venue. This surprised me, as my friends who had compact cameras (which the Nikon D40x is not) were allowed into the show. Many of these cameras were of higher resolution than mine. While they were allowed into the show, I, in the mean time, had to hike back to the car and secure my camera, thus missing the majority of the LCD Sound System's set. I might note, that I am a fan of the LCD Sound System, and feel somewhat robbed by that experience.

I would have left my camera at home, but, after checking the Thanksgiving Point web site as well as my ticket I saw no notification that cameras of any type were barred. I took my camera in good faith that I would be allowed to take pictures of what I experienced and of my good friends' enjoyment of the show and of Thanksgiving Point.

Was I mistaken? Are certain cameras allowed and others are not? Why was such a distinction not made public? Why was it not posted on your web site?

Honestly, I am really not certain where the distinction in cameras s being made here. As most people who attend concerts, I only take photos of things I want to remember, and if I share them on the Internet (as my friends who brought compact, higher resolution cameras have already done) it is only for the purpose of sharing my experience with my friends. The arbitrary rules excluding my camera or other such digital single lens reflex cameras at Thanksgiving Point seem out of place in our day and age.

Can you explain to me why I was forced to 1) not be able to take pictures that would advertise the beauty of your venue to my friends, and 2) miss a substantial portion of the show that I paid $36.00 for in order to secure a camera that is of lower resolution than cameras that were allowed into the show?

Sincerely,

[Theorris Boonasty, Esq.]

Labels: , , , , ,

9:37 AM 4 comments Listen to this article Listen to this article

 

"It is a tale/Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury...." (Shakespeare, Macbeth, Act 5, scene 3, 26-27)

My Photo
Name: theorris
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Two things I need: 1) Environmentally sound vehicle with sporty looks but able to go camping at the drop of a tent pole; 2)Google to allow the strike tag back into their profile box. Do nothing evil, eh, Google? That's pretty damn evil.

Recent posts

Archives

Poor players who strut & fret



follow me on Twitter



theorris's Last.fm Overall Tracks Chart

The Austere Circle

Comments by dotcomments

Blogarama - The Blog Directory

Powered by Blogger

Locations of visitors to this page

Subscribe with Bloglines

www.flickr.com
This is a Flickr badge showing public photos from Theorris. Make your own badge here.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 License.
2007: simple living.